Finding the people who will get a review into a publication
where it will be read by the segment of the public I have in mind is doubly
hard. I want NEQUA to find it’s way into the academic and public libraries.
Why, ------because I have developed certain suppositions about the motives behind the
writing and printing by the original copyright holders. I feel that the ideas they exposed are
still very valid and thus need to be available for readers in a form other than
microfilm. The setting of the
story and method of introducing the ideas allows for a person with an avowed
dislike of SOCIALISM and SOCIALIST ideas to perhaps read the book without
shutting their mind, as many of us are trained to do in college classes, which
investigate social and economic systems other than democracy and capitalism.
I am also positive that
there are quasi-religious ideas available for a reader of NEQUA that were
written into the book. Ideas which lay dormant because they are not part of the
main stream of American life. Some
ideas which my eyes and intellect could perceive, but many more that a lack of
background and experience on my part is kept hidden from my intellect. “Hints” that due to societal changes
or a lack of guided suggestion, would be read by me, with no ability to cross
reference since the origins of some
material or methods of explaining them has changed drastically since the book
was originally printed. In other words the common everyday “knowledge of events”
which the average man would carry in a
life time in the 1900’s, was very different than my view looking
backward from 2015. Only by deconstructing the book with a look out for catch
phrases or cliches from 1900 could one actually see the origins of the book and the intent of the authors.
I found the “mother-love”
concept by accident. The names and descriptions of the characters and place
names which appear in NEQUA are also not happenstance.
My conclusions as
described were partially born out in
statements which appear in a review written by Michelle Yost. She finds
several notations which she feels are derived from Mary Baker Eddy and her
belief system. I have read some Christian Science material but I missed the
references she found. Her review appears in the current issue of Foundation: The International Review
of Science Fiction which is published
in Liverpool, England.